And there is elision of the i of that parasmaipada affix which is the substitute of a la having an indicatory ṅ,
Thus, for ति we have त्, for सि we have स्, &c, as in the above table. The इ of Atmanepada is, however, not elided, because the anuvritti of Parasmaipada is understood here from sutra_ 3.4.97. Thus अपचत्, अपाक्षीत्, but अपचावहि and अपचामहि।,